Humble Roots: How Humility Grounds and Nourishes Your Soul, Hannah Anderson, Moody Publishers, October 2016, 207 pages.
When it comes to the twists and turns of life, no one really expects to be able to handle the really big things, so we cut ourselves some slack. The little things should be well within our grasp, or so we think. But when the normal stuff of everyday life overwhelms us, stress and anxiety kick in. If this does not apply to you, praise God, but for the rest of us, we need help. This latest book by Hannah Anderson does just that by getting to the root of the problem - pride.
When we think of pride, boasting and promoting one's self are obvious manifestations. But what about thinking "we are stronger and more capable than we actually are... that we must do and be more than we are able?" (pg. 40) Thus we push ourselves to the limit and find ourselves physically, emotionally, and spiritually exhausted. We find ourselves longing for rest, but this rest is only to be found "when we humble ourselves and submit to Him." (pg. 25) Yet humility is more than self-abasement or changing external behavior. It comes from seeing Jesus for who He really is in His person and His work. In that light, we are humbled because "He is the model and the means of our own humility." (pp. 76, 57) However, the book does not end here. The author applies humility to how we view our physical bodies, emotions, and minds. It also affects the way we steward the gifts God has given us, pursue our desires, and make sense of the brokenness of this world.
I loved Hannah's first book, Made for More, so I was eager to read Humble Roots. I appreciate that she writes from a perspective of wholeness in that we are body and soul and our faith should make a difference in every aspect of our lives. I also appreciate that her books speak across a wide range of age and experience. I gave a copy of Humble Roots to my college-aged daughter who is dealing with academic stress and the new responsibilities of adulthood. (She could not put the book down and had to make herself stop reading and do her homework.) I am middle-aged and tempted to be complacent in the skills that I have acquired over the years. But I am also becoming more aware that it will only be a matter of time before the strength of body and mind will be diminished just with age alone. This book ministered to us both because, even though we are at different stages in life, we cannot shoulder the burdens of life ourselves. Without Him, we can do nothing.
Humble Roots is a delight to read. It is beautifully written with examples from Hannah's life, her Appalachian church community, history, and horticulture. Humble Roots is also theologically sound and grounded in the gospel. It is convicting, but it will encourage you to find the rest that Jesus offers to weary souls. I highly recommend this book.
I will be giving away one copy of Humble Roots. Please enter your name and email address in the form below. The giveaway ends Sunday October 16 at midnight EDT. I will contact the winner the following day. Thanks for entering!
(The giveaway has ended.)
I received a copy of this book from Moody Publishers. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission's 16 CFR, Part 255: "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising."
Friday, October 14, 2016
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
20 Surprising Ways a "Believer" Can Be Self-Deceived
In 1937 Arthur Pink
wrote,
And the beat goes on. Evangelicals en masse believe they will inherit eternal life because they have “asked Jesus into their heart”, even though many know nothing of what it means to test themselves to see if their faith is genuine.
In the past the practice of carefully examining ourselves was considered normal and necessary in order to expose self-deceived professors and hypocrites, rebuke worldly Christians, and assure genuine believers.
“The "Gospel" which is now being
proclaimed is, in nine cases out of
every ten—but a perversion of the Truth, and tens of thousands, assured
they are bound for Heaven, are now hastening to Hell, as fast as time can take
them!” 1
And the beat goes on. Evangelicals en masse believe they will inherit eternal life because they have “asked Jesus into their heart”, even though many know nothing of what it means to test themselves to see if their faith is genuine.
In the past the practice of carefully examining ourselves was considered normal and necessary in order to expose self-deceived professors and hypocrites, rebuke worldly Christians, and assure genuine believers.
Matthew
Meade (1629– 1699), was a Puritan and contemporary of John Owen,
Bunyan, and Richard Baxter, who lived in a time when Protestantism had
spread quickly and hypocrisy was rampant.
But the diligent Puritans had no “lack of fidelity in
applying to the churches tests of fearless thoroughness.” 2 Appointed
by Oliver Cromwell to the New Chapel at Shadwell, England, Meade’s works
were held in high esteem and are still considered to be some of the greatest
writings on Christian living. “The Almost Christian
Discovered” was written as a wake-up call to devout parishioners who
believed themselves to be Christians but were not born again.
The book poses four questions giving the most attention to the first—“How far may a man go
in the way to heaven, and be almost a Christian?” Twenty ways
an unregenerate person can appear to be a Christian are explained using
Biblical examples, raising objections, and comparing the counterfeit to the
real McCoy.
1.
He may have much knowledge.
2.
He may have great gifts.
3.
He may have a high profession.
4.
He may do much against sin.
5.
He may desire grace.
6.
He may tremble at the word.
7.
He may delight in the word.
8.
He may be a member of the church of Christ.
9.
He may have great hopes of heaven.
10.
He may be under great and visible changes.
11.
He may be very zealous in the matters of religion.
12.
He may be much in prayer.
13.
He may suffer for Christ.
14.
He may be called of God.
15.
He may, in some sense, have the Spirit if God.
16.
He may have some kind of faith.
17.
He may love the people of God.
18.
He may go far in obeying the commands of God.
19.
He may be, in some sense, sanctified.
20.
He may do all, as to external duties, that a true Christian can, and
yet be no better than almost a Christian.
Passages like Hebrews 6:4-5 can be difficult for some of us to understand and this study will help to clarify their meaning.
“For in the case of those who have
once been enlightened and have tasted of the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit,
and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come, an then have fallen away, it is
impossible to renew them again to repentance.” Heb. 6:4-5
For example, #15 explains how “A man may have the spirit of God, and yet be but almost a Christian."
"Balaam had the Spirit of God given him when he blessed Israel: “Balaam saw Israel abiding in tents, and the Spirit of the Lord came upon him.” Judas had; for by the Spirit he cast out devils; he was one of them that came to Christ, and said, “Lord, even the devils are subject to us.” Saul had—“Behold, a company of prophets met him; and the Spirit of God came upon him, and be prophesied among them.”
Objection. But you will say, “Can a man have the Spirit
of God, and yet not be a Christian?” Indeed, the Scripture saith, “If any man have not the Spirit of Christ,
he is none of his;” but surely if any man have the Spirit of Christ, he is
his!
Answer. There is a having the Spirit, which is a
sure mark of saintship. Where the Spirit
is an effectual prevailing principle of grace and sanctification, renewing and
regenerating the heart: where the Spirit is a potent worker, “helping the
soul’s infirmities: where the Spirit is so as to “abide forever.” But now every
man that hath the Spirit, hath not the Spirit in this manner.”
Meade goes on to prove how this moving of
the Holy Spirit in the life of an unbeliever relates to those who commit the
unpardonable sin (Mark 3:22-30; Matt.
12:22-32)
“A man may have the Spirit
of God working in him, and yet it may be resisted by him….
A man may have the Spirit, and yet sin that unpardonable sin: he
may have the Holy Ghost, and yet sin the sin against the Holy Ghost;—nay, no
man can sin this sin against it, but he that hath some degree of it.
The true believer hath so
much of the Spirit, such a work of it in him, that he cannot sin that sin: “He that is born of God, sins not:” to wit,
that “sin unto death,” for that is meant. The carnal professing sinner, he cannot sin
that sin, because he is carnal and sensual, having not the Spirit. A man must have some measure of the Spirit
that sins this sin: so hath the hypocrite: he is said to be “partaker of the
Holy Ghost,” and he only is capable of sinning the sin against the Holy Ghost.”
This book has challenged
me on several points. Could it be possible that I am among the multitudes of religious self deceived professors who will say on the Day of
Judgement “Lord, Lord”? However, Meade makes it clear that he has no intention
of discouraging the true child of God
and it is those who will respond to such questioning with the deepest concern
for their soul. “Is it I?” was the sorrowful reaction of the disciples when Christ
declared that one of them would betray Him. God
doesn’t want His children to be burdened with doubt but desires that we have full
confidence and joy in our salvation. Furthermore,
it is this kind of scrutiny that will produce that assurance. The Scriptures themselves make it very clear
that it is possible to know that we
have been born again.
“These things I have written to you
who believe in the name of the Son of God, so that you may know that you have eternal life.”
I Jn. 5:13
Meade concludes,
“Now therefore, hath the spirit of the Lord
been at work in your souls? Have you
ever been convinced of the evil of sin, of the misery of a natural state, of
the insufficiency of all things under heaven to help, of the fullness and
righteousness of Jesus Christ, of the necessity of resting upon him for pardon
and peace, for sanctification and salvation? Have you ever been really convinced of
these things? O then, as you love your
own souls, as ever you hope to be saved at last, and enjoy God for ever,
improve these convictions, and be sure you rest not in them till they rise up
to a thorough close with the Lord Jesus Christ, and so end in a sound and
perfect conversion. Thus shall you be not only almost,
but altogether a Christian.”
____________________________________
1. Signs
of the Times – Studies in the Scriptures,
December 1937
2. Prefatory note by William R.
Williams (1850) to The Almost Christian Discovered or the False Professor Tried
and Cast, by Matthew Meade – public
domain - A free eBook is available HERE
Other articles related to this subject:
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
Let Him take care of the rest
Lord willing, I will be reviewing Hannah Anderson's new book, Humble Roots, in a couple weeks. I have not finished reading the entire book yet, but this passage was too good not to share. There are some days when it is more than enough to get through the day. Not that I've had any crises, but normal life can be so overwhelming at times. It feels especially more difficult when my nemesis, my inner Little Red Hen, tries to tell me that my only recourse is "do it myself." When I read this, it was a balm to my soul. I hope it encourages you as well.
Failure at small things reminds us of how helpless we are in this great, wide world. When little things spiral out of control, they remind us that even they were never within our control in the first place.
And this is terrifying.
Jesus understood this. He understood that small things can unsettle us more than large things; so when He called the people of Galilee to leave their anxiety—when He calls us to do the same— He does so in context of very mundane, very ordinary concerns.
“Do not be anxious about your life,” He assures them, “what you will eat or what you will drink, nor about your body, what you will put on.”...
“But if God so clothes the grass of the field . . . will he not much more clothe you, O you of little faith?”
We may be unable to cope with the most basic realities of existence; but He isn’t. In fact, He’s already providing food for the birds and luxurious garments for the flowers. They don’t worry because they know that their Creator cares for them. They don’t worry because they know the One who keeps this world running...
When we believe that we are responsible for our own existence, when we trust our ability to care for ourselves, we will have nothing but stress because we are unequal to the task. You know this. Deep inside, you know your limits even as you fight against them. You know your helplessness even as you press forward by sheer determination. But at some point, the world becomes too much, and the largeness of life threatens to overwhelm you. And when it does, you must stop. And you must do what Jesus told His friends and followers to do on that flowered hillside overlooking the Sea of Galilee: “Seek first the kingdom of God and his righteousness, and all these things will be added to you.”
Your heavenly Father knows what you need. He knows your heart is troubled. He also knows, better than you do, that all these things are beyond you. And so, this is what you must do, all that you must do: You must seek Him. And let Him take care of the rest.
From Humble Roots: How Humility Grounds and Nourishes Your Soul, Hannah Anderson, Moody Publishers, 2016, pp. 26-29.
Wednesday, September 14, 2016
You keep using that word...
Since Diane and Kim have been posting on Bible study and hermeneutics, I am going to follow in their train. This is a repost from my personal blog from 2014.
Lately I've been digging into the nuts and bolts of Bible interpretation. This was triggered by a journal article I had read which examined different views among conservative Christians on a particular subject. These differing views stemmed from different interpretations of a single New Testament (NT) word which in turn led to different applications. On one side, the meaning was derived with emphasis on the root definition. On the other side, the context was given more weight.
As a result, I've been consulting D.A. Carson's Exegetical Fallacies, Invitation To Biblical Interpretation by Drs. Kostenberger and Patterson, and this Tabletalk article. These resources shed quite a bit of light on the pitfalls of interpreting Scripture and the fallacies we inadvertently commit. It's also been highly mortifying. I've committed many if not all of these word fallacies and made assumptions about biblical words that were just plain wrong. After cringing inside at my mistakes, I couldn't help but think of this:
So with Inigo Montoya's admonition, here a few things I've gleaned about how not to interpret that Bible:
After this foray into fallacies, I'm probably a bit more cautious about how I interpret the Bible. There are many factors including etymology, usage at the time written, context, culture, and authorship, to name a few, that all need to be taken into account and given their appropriate weight for the given text. There is no single, one-size-fits-all, rigid formula because language is not static.
I also needn't be afraid of making an attempt to interpret Scripture, but this doesn't give me a license to be careless either. This is God's Holy Word we're talking about. All the more reason to approach the Bible with humility, treat it with respect, think carefully, use resources wisely, and pray for the Holy Spirit to illumine the text and keep me from error.
For more information:
Exegetical Fallacies, D.A. Carson, Baker Book House, 1996, 2nd. edition.
Invitation to Biblical Interpretation: Exploring the Hermeneutical Triad of History, Literature, and Theology, Andreas J. Kostenberger, Richard D. Patterson, Kregel, 2011.
Word-Study Fallacies: Words of Caution, Robert J. Cara, Tabletalk, Vol. 38. No. 1, January 2014, pp. 13-15.
1. Kostenberger and Patterson, pp. 579-580.
2. Cara pg. 13, Carson pp. 28-29.
3. Cara, pg. 14, Carson, pp. 34-35
4. Carson, pg. 30.
5. Kostenberger and Patterson, pp. 643-644.
Some additional resources since I wrote the original post:
Doin' the Wonky with Words: 4 Word Study Missteps, George Guthrie - Part 1 and Part 2
Grasping God's Word, J. Scott Duvall, J. Daniel Hays, Zondervan, 2012.
Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, William W. Klein, Craig L. Blomberg, Robert L. Hubbard, Jr., Thomas Nelson, 2004.
Lately I've been digging into the nuts and bolts of Bible interpretation. This was triggered by a journal article I had read which examined different views among conservative Christians on a particular subject. These differing views stemmed from different interpretations of a single New Testament (NT) word which in turn led to different applications. On one side, the meaning was derived with emphasis on the root definition. On the other side, the context was given more weight.
As a result, I've been consulting D.A. Carson's Exegetical Fallacies, Invitation To Biblical Interpretation by Drs. Kostenberger and Patterson, and this Tabletalk article. These resources shed quite a bit of light on the pitfalls of interpreting Scripture and the fallacies we inadvertently commit. It's also been highly mortifying. I've committed many if not all of these word fallacies and made assumptions about biblical words that were just plain wrong. After cringing inside at my mistakes, I couldn't help but think of this:
So with Inigo Montoya's admonition, here a few things I've gleaned about how not to interpret that Bible:
- The Bible was written in a real language by real people for real people in a real historical period. It is not a mystical book where every noun is symbolic and every word has hidden meaning. There is no code to crack. There is no special "Holy Spirit" Greek.1
- A little Greek (or Hebrew) can be a dangerous thing. Looking up a Strong's number does not a scholar make.
- One can't assume meaning is always derived from the root word (etymological fallacy). If I say, "Mrs. Smith is a nice person," I'm not implying she is ignorant. The Latin root for "nice" is the word for ignorant, but the usage has changed over time. Since Greek is a real language, it too can change over the centuries. Etymology derived from Homer's day (8th century B.C.) will not be helpful for understanding a NT word. As an example, "missing the mark" is probably not the best definition for sin as that meaning was probably obsolete by NT times, not to mention downplaying the seriousness of sin. 2
- Conversely, don't impose our modern understanding of a word on the Bible (semantic anachronism). The root word for "power" is "dynamos" from which Alfred Nobel coined the name of his explosive. But his discovery took place in the 1860's. The NT writers, therefore, could not have had dynamite in mind when they wrote about the power of the Holy Spirit, and neither should we. 3
- The meaning of a word is not necessarily derived from the sum of its parts. Our understanding of "butterfly" is not enhanced by knowing the definition of "butter" and "fly." Likewise, we can't assume this about the Greek language either. 4
- The authors of the NT used synonyms like any writer to vary the language. Therefore, one can't assume theological meaning behind every word choice. The prime example is assuming that "agapao" and "phileo" always refer to two different types of love. (Raise your hand if you've done this too.) But this isn't so! Both words are used interchangeably for divine and human love in the Gospel of John. 5
- A definition is a one piece of information to take into consideration. Don't miss the tree or even the entire forest by focusing on a single twig.
- Context, context, context!
After this foray into fallacies, I'm probably a bit more cautious about how I interpret the Bible. There are many factors including etymology, usage at the time written, context, culture, and authorship, to name a few, that all need to be taken into account and given their appropriate weight for the given text. There is no single, one-size-fits-all, rigid formula because language is not static.
I also needn't be afraid of making an attempt to interpret Scripture, but this doesn't give me a license to be careless either. This is God's Holy Word we're talking about. All the more reason to approach the Bible with humility, treat it with respect, think carefully, use resources wisely, and pray for the Holy Spirit to illumine the text and keep me from error.
For more information:
Exegetical Fallacies, D.A. Carson, Baker Book House, 1996, 2nd. edition.
Invitation to Biblical Interpretation: Exploring the Hermeneutical Triad of History, Literature, and Theology, Andreas J. Kostenberger, Richard D. Patterson, Kregel, 2011.
Word-Study Fallacies: Words of Caution, Robert J. Cara, Tabletalk, Vol. 38. No. 1, January 2014, pp. 13-15.
1. Kostenberger and Patterson, pp. 579-580.
2. Cara pg. 13, Carson pp. 28-29.
3. Cara, pg. 14, Carson, pp. 34-35
4. Carson, pg. 30.
5. Kostenberger and Patterson, pp. 643-644.
Some additional resources since I wrote the original post:
Doin' the Wonky with Words: 4 Word Study Missteps, George Guthrie - Part 1 and Part 2
Grasping God's Word, J. Scott Duvall, J. Daniel Hays, Zondervan, 2012.
Introduction to Biblical Interpretation, William W. Klein, Craig L. Blomberg, Robert L. Hubbard, Jr., Thomas Nelson, 2004.
Tuesday, September 6, 2016
Contending for Old School Hermeneutics
“what is one small hermeneutical step in the wrong direction turns out to be one giant step toward the wrong theology” 1 - Norman L. Geisler
If you've followed this blog for a while you know that we love the subject of hermeneutics. Proper interpretation of the Bible is essential in order to have a right understanding of God's Word and to protect us against false doctrine. I don't pretend to be a scholar but I have been around long enough to be able to spot the insidious new wave of liberalism resurfacing in conservative evangelical churches in recent years.
One reason for
this is the ongoing attack on the inerrancy of
Scripture and a departure from traditional principles
of interpretation. The emergence of the “new”
hermeneutic has been investigated
by Robert L. Thomas in his
book Evangelical Hermeneutics; The New Versus the Old :
“Changes in hermeneutics have coincided with changes in evangelicalism. … Recent hermeneutical trends have forced evangelical interpreters to choose between two hermeneutical systems that oppose each other in dramatic ways. ….There is utter confusion because they share no commonly accepted hermeneutical procedures among themselves.” 2"the most notable difference between new hermeneutics and traditional principles is the overwhelmingly subjective nature of the new approaches versus the objectivism of the old. ... The new hermeneutics provide no stopping points to limit the extremes to which individual personal inclination may go in fostering new teachings allegedly derived from Scripture."3
Many of these changes in hermeneutics are affecting the church’s thinking
regarding feminism, missiology, ecumenism,
Gnosticism,
and homosexuality, just to name a few. So, here's a reminder of some of the fundamental rules for engaging in a God honoring study of the Bible.
TRADITIONAL HERMENEUTICS
Inerrancy: Believing in the inerrancy of Scripture is an absolute prerequisite. We must come to the Bible believing that it is entirely true and without error in the original writings. It can be fully trusted in every sense, including all matters pertaining to science, history, geology, and spiritual enlightenment.
We believe in the grammatical-historical method of interpreting Scripture based on a specific set of hermeneutical
principles. When we talk about grammatical we’re referring to the
words, their meanings, the sentence structure, the interaction with
the original language, ect. By historical we’re speaking of things
like: Who wrote it? Why did they write it? When
did they write it? Who did they write it to? What was
the cultural context? Was it written to Israel or the Church?
Changes have brought
about much confusion over definitions therefore a good traditional definition of Hermeneutics could be defined as
“a set of principles” while exegesis “is an implementation of
valid interpretive principles" 4. Simply
stated, hermeneutics would be equivalent to the “rule book” for
playing the game and exegesis would be like “playing the game”.
“As a theological discipline hermeneutics is the science of the correct interpretation of the Bible….It stands in the same relationship to exegesis that a rule-book stands to a game. …The rules are not the game, and the game is meaningless without the rules. Hermeneutics proper is not exegesis, but exegesis is applied to hermeneutics” 5- Bernard Ramm
PLAYING BY THE RULES
Scripture Must Be Interpreted Literally
We’ve always abided
by the principle, “If the plain sense makes good sense, seek no
other sense.” The authors of Scripture
wrote to their audiences with a specific purpose (authorial
intent) and just as we wouldn't look for mystical meanings in
an email from a friend, we also don't want
to tamper with the plain intentions the author of
Scripture had in mind. Ramm points out that to interpret Scripture literally is to
“understand a document the best one can in the context of the
normal, usual, and customary, tradition” 6
The Principle of Single Meaning
Traditional
hermeneutics have always held that Scripture has but one meaning
although there may be many applications.
“A fundamental principle in grammatico-historical exposition is that the words and sentences can have but one significance in one and the same connection. The moment we neglect this principle we drift out upon a sea of uncertainty and conjecture.”7– Milton S. Terry
The principle of single
meaning has especially fallen on hard times in the world of
hermeneutics. Robert Thomas sounds the alarm in his
rebuttal to a number of modern authors in his article The Principle of Single Meaning:
“A mass evangelical exodus from this time-honored principle of interpreting Scripture is jeopardizing the church’s access to the truths that are taught therein. Whether interpreters have forsaken the principle intentionally or have subconsciously ignored it, the damage is the same. The only hope of escape from the pit into which so many have fallen is to reaffirm the principle of single meaning along with the other hermeneutical principles that have served the believing community so well through the centuries.” 8
Doctrinal Unity
This principle protects us from false doctrine. When we come to difficult passages we go with the whole teaching of Scripture on the subject. For instance, verses like Philippians 2:12 “work out your salvation with fear and trembling” are used by cults to teach a works based salvation. But the principle of Doctrinal (or Theological) Unity takes into consideration the fact that the entire body of Scripture combined overwhelmingly teaches otherwise, therefore there must be another explanation of this verse because we know the Bible does not contradict itself.
Scripture Is Its Own Authority
The authority of
interpretation does not come from ourselves. The popular
trend of asking "What does this passage mean to you?"
is a sure prescription for doctrinal disaster. Equally dangerous is
the belief that religious institutions have the
final authority in interpreting Scripture. Rather, it is
from within the Scriptures themselves that we have the means to interpret
them.
“obscure passages in Scripture must give way to clear passages….The Roman Catholic Church claimed that it possessed the mind of Christ and the mind of the Spirit in its teaching magisterium so that it could render obscure doctrines clear. The Reformers rejected the claim of the [RCC] that it had the gift of grace and illumination to know what the Holy Scripture taught. In place of an appeal to the teaching magisterium of the Church, the Reformers proclaimed that Scripture interprets Scripture” 9
Grammar
That is, the words and sentences must be
properly understood. Of course
knowing the original language would be preferable but for the rest of us the
use of various Greek and Hebrew word study books will come in handy.
Context
A. What are the verses before and after it saying?Just as location, location, location is to real estate, context is king in Scripture. It is easy to assume popular evangelical interpretations. For example, I Corinthians 6:19 states: “do you not know that your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit” is often taken out of context to present a case for healthy living when it is actually referring to fleeing sexual immorality. Other questions include - What is the book and its theme? Is it Old or New Testament? How does the word relate to the verse, the paragraph, the chapter, and the entire book?B. Cross referencing“grammatical interpretation takes into consideration parallel passages or cross references…what is said in one part of Scripture may illuminate what is said in another part of Scripture.” 10C. Historical and culturalWhen was it written? Where did this take place? What were the issues being addressed? What was the cultural setting of the time? etc. Reference tools that are helpful would be Bible maps and encyclopedias and the works of early historians such Eusebius and Josephus.
It is so important to keep reaffirming these time honored principles for
interpretation when we study our Bibles
so that we might prove to be “a
workman who does not need to be ashamed, accurately handling the word of truth.”
2 Tim. 2:15
____________________________
- One Small Step for Hermeneutics, One Giant Leap for Theology by Norman L. Geisler
- Evangelical Hermeneutics; The New Versus the Old by Robert Thomas: Kregel; 2002Thomas: ibid pg. 17, 19
- Thomas ibid. pg 508
- Thomas ibid; pg 27
- Protestant Biblical Interpretation: A Textbook of Hermeneutics by Bernard Ramm; Baker Book House; 1970; pg 27
- Ramm: ibid: pg 121
- Biblical Hermeneutics by Milton S. Terry 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan) pg. 2
- The Principle of Single Meaning; Robert L. Thomas, The Masters Seminary Journal; Spring 2001; pg. 33-47
- Ramm: ibid: pg 104-105
- Ramm; ibid. pg.14
Labels:
Bible Study,
Diane Bucknell,
Hermeneutics,
Theology
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



